Monthly Archives: February 2013

image

Book Review: Al Gore ‘The Future’ (W.H. Allen)

The Future, Al Gore (WH Allen £25)

Eight years ago someone asked Al Gore ‘What are the drivers of global change?’ He listed what he calls ‘the usual suspects’ but subsequently decided that the question deserved closer attention than he had given it. The Future is his considered response and at 558 pages including 154 pages of endnotes, nobody can say he hasn’t put in the time.

He identifies six areas that converge and interact with each other and need fresh thinking ‘in order to reclaim control of our destiny and shape the future’. These are the emergence of an interconnected global economy; planet-wide electronic communications; a new balance of political, economic and military power; rapid unsustainable growth; the revolution of life sciences; and global warming.

Each of the six gets a chapter and in the early chapters there is a relative balance of challenges and opportunities. The challenges posed by the rapidly increasing integration of the global economy (or Earth Inc.), for example, include the outsourcing and robosourcing of jobs and a constantly increasing wealth gap. Gore would respond by rethinking the central role of consumption in our economies, promoting a form of sustainable capitalism and redefining what we think of as employment.

The challenge side eventually morphs into a series of actual or potential threats: a west to east power shift, the spread of weapons, extinction of species, waste and pollution, climate refugees, topsoil erosion, and problems associated with GM crops and the digitisation of life. Undeterred by the sheer weight of it all, Gore is buoyed by a problematic optimism which relies on humanity turning away from its ‘baser instincts’.

An issue for Gore is that it is not optimism but hypocrisy that is increasingly defining him and occluding his message. There has been a hardening of the vague sense of unease that once accompanied his flying around the world decrying global warming while adding to it or appearing increasingly overweight on television while declaiming about unequal resource consumption (‘so passionate about saving this Earth, he is trying not to exhale’ as Jon Stewart of The Daily Show put it).

At the start of the year, Gore sold his Current TV station to Al Jazeera, itself owned by oil rich Qatar, and at least one commentator claimed that the successful completion of that sale meant he is now richer than Mitt Romney. Under the circumstances, an objective reading of Gore is becoming increasingly difficult: an excellent section on the damage wrought by corporate America, for instance, is somewhat overshadowed by the feeling that Gore Inc. can’t be far away.

On the other hand, a number of the ideas outlined here resurfaced in President Obama’s 2013 State of the Union address including the possibility of increasing American manufacturing employment through developments in 3D printing and references to the wealth gap, raising taxes on the rich, and global warming. If, as seems likely, Nobel Prize winning Gore has the ear of the President that must be a good thing especially when you consider who is arraigned on the other side – global warming deniers (‘liars for hire’ as Gore calls them), tax loophole preservers and so on.

Britain has its own mini-Gore in the form of Paddy Ashdown who appeared at last year’s Edinburgh International Book Festival to express some of the same concerns, especially the shift in power from West to East. Ashdown wants to see a new system of treaty based global governance but when asked what he would do if the political class would not cooperate he answered ‘no idea’. Gore entertains no such solution and no such uncertainty. A section on whether America’s decline is absolute or relative (the staple diet of any number of Britain’s post World War Two historians) concludes that it is relative but slow. American universities, its venture investment culture and it military are still, according to Gore, the best in the world. He recognizes a demographic deficit and an overwhelming corporate influence on American politics but has no doubt about who should lead the way into the future. The United States of America ‘remains the only nation capable of providing the kind of global leadership needed’.

In fact, for all his catholicity and range of reference, the underlying feeling of The Future is that Gore is not really talking to most of us. It is a book by an American crafted primarily for his fellow Americans. The text touches down at regular intervals to assert the ‘enduring genius’ of the US Constitution, for instance, or celebrate a ‘Pax Americana’ that some would consider thoroughly discredited in recent times.

The feeling that Gore’s core audience is American is not the only issue. Others include the fact that for a man worried about robosourcing he is a robotic writer and, occasionally, a robotic thinker.  The first five chapters mine the past rather simplistically in search of principles that still inform the present, but may be under threat in the future. It is only in the climate change chapter that Gore seems fully comfortable with his material and easy in its expression. In addition, his tendency to be prescriptive rarely acknowledges that human beings and nations act in unpredictable or unexpected ways. A brief section on Oscar Pistorius and performance-enhancement in sports is illuminating in that respect, though only with hindsight. So too the recent history of America’s northern neighbour Canada: once the home of Greenpeace, now home to polluting oil sands and withdrawn from the Kyoto Protocol.

A disclosure at the end of the acknowledgements that the author has a direct or indirect investment in ‘Apple, Auxogyn, Citizens Bank, Coursera, Facebook, Google, JP Morgan Chase, Kaiima, and Twitter’ appears to have little context until combined with Gore’s oft-repeated ‘recovering politician’ joke at the beginning of the book. Even at sixty four and despite all protestations to the contrary, a political comeback is not unthinkable. After all, if America really is the ship of the future, it will need a captain. 

Related Articles

Popular Articles

Other Stories

image

Event Review Kin Part 2 Summerhall 16/02/2013

 

                        Roy Gill and the unicorn/horse

 

Kin Part 2 takes place in what was once the dissection room of the Royal Dick Veterinary School, now one of many interesting spaces in Edinburgh’s Summerhall multi-arts venue. Kin Part 1 used the same space to great effect a week earlier with four writers presenting new short stories on the theme of family as part of LGBT history month. In between times, someone has chalked an image of a unicorn on the blackboard. Or perhaps a plain horse in disguise, given the recent adverse publicity that has attached itself to that part of the Equidae family.

 

For the writers, however, there is nowhere to hide. Bench rows incline steeply from the stage (so that dissections could be easily seen in bygone days) and every seat is taken. If this week’s readers are intimidated, they are disguising it well.First up is Roy Gill who tells of fantasy and reality in teenage discovery. Islay Bell-Webb story of an exploding lesbian haloneliness, acceptance, convergence and healing in it but not in ways that anyone in the audience could have anticipated.Allan Radcliffe’s is a beautifully related cautionary tale for parents of LGBT children with an interesting complication at the heart of a classic teenage bullying scene. Mary Paulson-Ellis cleverly picks up on the theme of dissection and relates the dissecting of a frog to the thoughts of a boy hoping to fill up a spare chamber in his own heart where love should be.

 

The question and answer session is cheerfully moderated by Carole Jones. The writers have some interesting things to say about the popularity of the short story among LGBT writers and whether the form appeals to those on the margins or is just easier to publish. One audience member thinks that the writers sound very safe in their various families. This, she says, contrasts with her own generation of LGBT activism which saw the family ‘as something to be done away with’.

 

Roy Gill’s reflections on gay narratives in Dr Who leads to some speculation about the possibility of similar narratives in Star Trek. The writers can’t agree on the latter though Islay Bell-Webb reveals that she has a t-shirt with ‘where no man has gone before’ printed on it.

 

The short stories presented at Kin can be can be read throughout February at http://www.lgbthistory.org.uk/

 

 

Related Articles

Popular Articles

Other Stories

image

Event Review: Kin, Summerhall 09/02/2013

DSCN0029.JPG

Kirsty Logan, Paul McQuade, Carole Jones, Zöe Strachan, George Anderson 

Event Review: Kin, Summerhall 09/02/2013

Last week’s British Parliamentary vote to support same-sex marriage in England and Wales perhaps gave an air of positive change to Saturday’s LGBT literary event held in Summerhall’s Dissection Room. Dubbed ‘Kin’ and organised by theatre critic and fiction writer Allan Radcliffe. The afternoon event was hosted by Edinburgh academic Carole Jones and featured readings by Scottish gay and lesbian writers Kirsty Logan, Paul McQuade, Zöe Strachan and Ronald Frame.

The large skylight in this former operation theatre provided a welcome glow for this respectful gathering. Upbeat Jones quipped about the location’s previous corporeal activity: ‘What an appropriate space for an event called Kin’. The four specially commissioned stories fell into two camps of serious and surreal, or ironic and comedic. Kirsty Logan’s  ‘Ice Child’ opened with the austere image of a woman giving birth in the snow; abandoned by her family for her bi-sexuality, she is found by a kind couple and adopted by them. In ‘The Impossible Flesh’, Paul McQuade gave a surreal, Frankenstein-like response to the difficulties of gay adoption; in his narrative the medically-savvy couple construct a son of their own. 

Unable to attend, Ronald Frame sent an apologetic missive that remarked on changes in social attitude: ‘Things have come a long way in thirty years – well, so they should – and this event today is proof of that’. However, Frame was there in spirit as Edinburgh writer George Anderson capably read ‘Bill and Coo’, an acerbic though patchy story about a shop-keeping lesbian couple who are run out of town.  Zöe Strachan closed the programme with ‘Dyke’s Delight ‘, a light-hearted narrative about a new lesbian club. The notion of ‘home’ is inserted near the end as a passerby remarks: ‘What’s that song you young ones dance to in there? We are family. Got to remember that’.

As the natural light faded, the readings gave way to elevated chat about the state of Scotland’s bedrooms (and queer literature). Interesting, though not conclusive, points ensued.  Born in the 1980s, Logan commented on how receptive the modern public is to queer literature and how she has yet to encounter obstacles in publication. Strachan commented that the image of homosexuality has been branded as cheerful: ‘It’s as if everyone gay was miserable before 1990, before Graham Norton’. Strachan also made the well-observed point that Scotland has a number of strong lesbian writers, but a visible lack of gay male writers. An alert audience member stated how important it is that gay literature thrives: ‘We are starved of LGBT material’.

Next Saturday 16 February at 3pm, Radcliffe has another dynamic line-up of local writers which includes himself, Mary Paulson-Ellis, Roy Gill and Islay Bell Webb. Expect them to dispel the slight air of trepidation that hung over an otherwise engaging and optimistic part one.

 

Related Articles

Popular Articles

Other Stories